Find Lawyer
KeywordLocation 


Find Lawyers.

Ford, Buddy D.

Name:Ford, Buddy D.
Practice In: Bankruptcy & Debt ,Bankruptcy ,Business Law ,Business Organization ,Estate ,Estate Planning ,Trusts
Law Firm: Buddy D. Ford, P.A.
Location:115 North MacDill Avenue
Tampa, FL 33609
Directions
Fax: 813-877-5543
http://www.tampaesq.com
 

Description of Practice

Active trial practice emphasizing plaintiffs' representation in medical, dental and legal malpractice, catastrophic personal injury, securities and investor fraud, wrongful employment discharge, insurance bad faith, construction defects and other general civil litigation.

Significant Professional Appointments and Positions

Member, Board of Directors - Colorado Trial Lawyers Association, 2003 - Present

Co-Chair - Interprofessional Committee of the Colorado and Denver Bar Associations, 2005 - Present

Member - The Million Dollar Advocates Forum, 2003 - Present

Fellow - Colorado Bar Foundation, 2006 - present

Editor - Professional Malpractice for "Trial Talk," 1988 - present

Significant Recent Trials:

Halgrimson v. Reichert, Pueblo County District Court, Case No. 99 CV 620. Medical malpractice case. Three and one-half week jury trial, May 2002. Won  verdict of $701,000. No settlement offer from defendant prior to trial.

Confidential Medical Malpractice Case Arbitrated in January 2003. Won arbitration award of $1,260,238. No settlement offer from defendant prior to trial.

Pragmatic Computing, Inc. Money Purchase Plan, et al. v. Wachovia Securities, NASD Arbitration No. 02-06220. Received arbitration award for investor fraud, including payment of interest and costs, in excess of $400,000, in July 2004. No settlement offer from respondents prior to hearing.

Other Recent Significant Litigation Results:

Recovered on behalf of clients, by way of settlement or satisfaction of judgment or award, total recoveries well in excess of $1 million in each of past four years, including 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005.

Significant Appellate Cases:

Kauntz V. HCA Healthone, LLC, Colorado Court of Appeals, Case No.: 2005 CA 2341.

Pending case, where underlying malpractice case was settled with physician shortly before trial, but Plaintiffs continued to pursue a separate claim against hospital for negligently credentialing physician to perform epidural procedures at its facility, knowing that physician's entire formal training for epidural procedures amounted to an unmonitored 1 1/2 day week-end course, which the course sponsor admitted should have only been a starting point for formal training. Seminal issue presented on appeal is whether Colorado's Peer Review Act, intended to abrogate the common law of negligent credentialing and immunize hospitals from such claims
 
Quiroz v. Goff, 46 P.3d 486 (Colo. App. 2002).

Malpractice case which defines when the statute of limitation begins to run where the tort victim knows that he has suffered injury as a result of complications from a medical care provider, but doesn't realize until later that the physician's treatment may have been negligent.

Spahr V. Secco, 330 F.3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2003).

Defines in the Tenth Circuit when question of arbitrability is decided by the Court versus the arbitration panel and the applicability of First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan, 514 U.S. 938 (1995) and Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg, 388 U.S. 395 (1967) to that issue.

State Farm v. Tye, 931 P.2d 540 (Colo. App. 1996).

Frequently cited case in State of Colorado. Established right of underinsured motorist claimant to settle with liability carrier for less than policy limits of liability policy, but still pursue claim under underinsured motorist policy for difference between underinsured motorist coverage limits and amount paid on liability policy, without deduction for difference between amount recovered on liability policy and the liability policy limits.

Spoor v. Serota, 852 P.2d 292 (Colo. App. 1992).

Frequently cited case in State of Colorado, which defines doctrine of res ipsa loquitur medical malpractice cases.

Bittle v. Brunetti, 750 P.2d 49 (Colo. 1988).

Involved challenge of age old precedent in the State of Colorado, to lack of recognized civil duty of landowners to comply with local ordinances to promptly remove snow and ice from adjoining pubic sidewalks. 

Tampa Law Lawyer
Lawyers Nearby
Find A Lawyer
Practice Area:
Where:
  Advanced Search