Find Lawyer
KeywordLocation 


Find Lawyers.

Das, Proloy K.

Name:Das, Proloy K.
Practice In: Accident & Injury ,Personal Injury ,Criminal ,Divorce & Family Law ,Family Law ,Real Estate ,Foreclosure
Law Firm: Rome McGuigan, P.C.
Location:One State Street 13th Floor
Hartford, CT 06103
Directions
Fax: 860-724-3921
http://www.rm-triallawyers.com
 

Attorney Das handles special litigation matters including appeals in criminal, civil, contract and family law cases. He joined Rome McGuigan in June 2007 after serving as an Assistant State's Attorney in the Appellate Bureau of the Chief State's Attorney's Office from 2002-2007 and as an adjunct professor on appellate advocacy at the University of Connecticut School of Law from 2005-2007. Attorney Das has briefed and argued over forty appeals in the Connecticut Appellate and Supreme Courts and has published several articles on developing trends in the law.

Representative Cases

Significant Supreme Court Cases

Televised Oral Arguments

  • Click here to see televised arguments before the Connecticut Supreme Court in Republican Party v. Denise W. Merrill, Secretary of the State (Sept. 2012)
  • Click here to see televised arguments before the Connecticut Supreme Court in St. Paul Travelers v. Kuehl (Oct 2010)
  • Click here to see televised trial court arguments in Connecticut State Police Union v. Governor, et al. (Sept 2011)

Other Cases Argued/Briefed

  • State v. Miscellaneous Fireworks, 132 Conn. App. 679 (2011) (successfully represented consumer pyrotechnics manufacturer against Connecticut Department of Public Safety and Attorney General over interpretation of statue regarding consumer pyrotechnics)
  • Connecticut State Police Union v. Governor, et. al., HHD-CV11-6024776-S (2012) (successfully represented State Police Union in action against Governor and Attorney General regarding police staffing mandates) 
  • Cruz v. Visual Perceptions, LLC, 136 Conn. App. 330 (2012) (breach of employment contract) (Supreme Court appeal pending)
  • Jansen v. Jansen, 136 Conn. App. 210 (2012) (modification of alimony obligation)
  • Canty v. Otto, 304 Conn. 546 (2012) (first impression issue over application of Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act)
  • Meyers v. Livingston, 134 Conn. App. 785 (2012) (statute of limitations for professional malpractice claim) (Supreme Court appeal pending)
  • McKeon v. Lennon, 131 Conn. App. 585 (2011) (appeal addressing financial order issued pursuant to judgement of divorce) 
  • Town of Marlborough vs. AFSME, Council 4, 130 Conn. App. 556 (2011) (town appeal from arbitration award regarding town assessor position)
  • Rostad v. Hirsch, 128 Conn. App. 119 (2011) (paternity action involving chairman of large corporation)  
  • Arias v. Geisinger, 126 Conn. App. 860 (2011) (motor vehicle exception to workers compensation exclusivity provision)
  • St. Paul Travelers v. Kuehl, 299 Conn. App. 800 (2011) (exhaustion of administrative remedies for workers compensation statutes)
  • Perricone v. Perricone, 292 Conn. 187 (2009) (constitutionality of non-defamation orders)
  • Froom Development Corp. v. Developers Realty, Inc., 114 Conn. App. 618 (2009) (commercial contracts)
  • State v. Preston, 286 Conn. 367 (2008) (jurisdictional of appellate court over probation revocation)
  • State v. Kelly, 106 Conn. App. 414 (2008) (prosecutorial impropriety)
  • Grant v. Commissioner of Correction, 103 Conn. App. 366 (2007) (ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • State v. Jose G., 102 Conn. App. 748 (2007) (adequacy of record; prosecutorial impropriety)
  • State v. Jones, 99 Conn. App. 196 (2007) (sufficiency of the evidence for drug possession)
  • State v. D'Haity, 99 Conn. App. 375 (2007) (sufficiency of evidence for sexual assault convictions)
  • State v. Smith, 280 Conn. 285 (2006) (source of semen exception to rape-shield law)
  • State v. Jackson, 93 Conn. App. 671 (2006) (reasonable doubt instruction)
  • State v. Moore, 97 Conn. App. 243 (2006) (accessory to criminal impersonation & failure to appear)
  • State v. Gumbs, 94 Conn. App. 747 (2006) (sufficiency of evidence for probation revocation)
  • State v. Sewell, 95 Conn. App. 815 (2006) (late disclosure of witness)
  • Hollby v. Commissioner of Correction, 98 Conn. App. 751 (2006) (ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Cole v. Commissioner of Correction, 96 Conn. App. 852 (2006) (ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • State v. Francis, 90 Conn. App. 676 (2005) (sufficiency of evidence)
  • State v. Monk, 88 Conn. App. 543 (2005) (adequacy of canvass)
  • State v. Marshall, 87 Conn. App. 592 (2005) (admissibility of evidence)
  • Dontigney v. Commissioner of Correction, 87 Conn. App. 681 (2005) (doctrine of collateral estoppel)
  • State v. Sanders, 86 Conn. App. 757 (2005) (admissibility of evidence)
  • Daniel H. v. Commissioner of Correction, 89 Conn. App. 904 (2005) (ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Daniels v. Commissioner of Correction, 86 Conn. App. 62 (2004) (actual innocence)
  • State v. Smith, 83 Conn. App. 411 (2004) (waiver of jury trial)
  • State v. Jarrett, 82 Conn. App. 489 (2004) (prosecutorial misconduct)
  • State v. Izzo, 82 Conn. App. 285 (2004) (admissibility of evidence)
  • State v. Bookless, 82 Conn. App. 216 (2004) (waiver)
  • State v. Vlahos, 81 Conn. App. 904 (2004) (reconciliation of General Statutes §§ 14-215 and 14-36)
  • State v. Ramos, 271 Conn. 785 (2004) (self-defense)
  • State v. Smith, 85 Conn. App. 96 (2004) (rape-shield law)
  • State v. Long, 268 Conn. 508 (2004) (constitutionality of insanity acquittee statutes)
  • State v. Singleton, 81 Conn. App. 409 (2004) (sufficiency of field tests for narcotics)
  • State v. McKiernan, 78 Conn. App. 182 (2003) (first amendment gloss to disorderly conduct statute)
  • State v. Bothwell, 78 Conn. App. 64 (2003) (scrivener's errors in DUI conviction)
  • State v. Harvey, 77 Conn. App. 225 (2003) (admissibility of evidence)
  • Bruno v. Commissioner of Correction, 74 Conn. App. 910 (2003) (ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • Dash v. Commissioner of Correction, 74 Conn. App. 909 (2003) (ineffective assistance of counsel)
  • State v. Santiago, 74 Conn. App. 736 (2003) (sufficiency of the evidence)

In the News

Hartford Law Lawyer
Lawyers Nearby
  • Agman, Nike Victoria
    Intellectual Property,Patent..etc
    One State Street 13th Floor
    Hartford, CT 06103
  • Alderman, Linda W.
    Administrative Law,Business Law..etc
    One State Street 13th Floor
    Hartford, CT 06103
  • Alderman, Myles H.
    Administrative Law,Business Law..etc
    One State Street 13th Floor
    Hartford, CT 06103
Find A Lawyer
Practice Area:
Where:
  Advanced Search